Welcome to David Mundy's nearly-daily blog. David is now in his 37th year as a United Church minister and has kept a journal for more than 30 years. This blog is more public but contains his personal musings and reflections on the world, through the lens of his Christian faith. Follow his Creation Blog, Groundling (groundlingearthyheavenly.blogspot.ca) and Mini Me blog (aka Twitter) @lionlambstp
I have received two related and rather unusual emails in recent days. They are about a project to establish what is described as an alternative set of commandments. I think these emails have come to me because I preached on the biblical Ten Commandments recently and what we post on the internet knows no bounds. Their commandments will essentially be the atheist commandments and the project involves crowd-sourced prizes of ten thousand dollars for winning submissions. Is Moses spinning in his grave on Nebo's lonely mountain?
This also promotes a book called ATHEIST MIND, HUMANIST HEART: Rewriting the Ten
Commandments for the Twenty-first Century Here is a description of the prize:
a re-imagining of the Ten Commandments for our modern age, with prizes of
$10,000 for the winning commandments (as chosen by a panel of distinguished
judges). It will be announced on October 30, but I’m happy to share more
information about this ahead of time if it’s of interest.
I wasn't sure whether to be pleased that these authors are using the commandments of the Judeo-Christian tradition as their foundation or annoyed. Honestly, can't they come up with some new material if this is the brave new post-religious world? I am curious to know what they come up with. I wonder if they realize that the late atheist celebre, Christopher Hitchens, already engaged in this exercise for Vanity Fair magazine back in 2010. Here are his suggestions:
Do not condemn people on the basis of their ethnicity or color. Do not ever use people as private property. Despise those who use violence or the threat of it in sexual relations. Hide your face and weep if you dare to harm a child.
Do not condemn people for their inborn nature—why would God create so many homosexuals only in order to torture and destroy them? Be aware that you too are an animal and dependent on the web of nature, and think and act accordingly.
Do not imagine that you can escape judgment if you rob people with a false prospectus rather than with a knife. Turn off that f****g cell phone—you have no idea how unimportant your call is to us. Denounce all jihadists and crusaders for what they are: psychopathic criminals with ugly delusions. Be willing to renounce any god or any religion if any holy commandments should contradict any of the above. In short: Do not swallow your moral code in tablet form.
What do you think about this project? Do you have your own alternative commandments? Are you content with the ones found in Exodus and Deuteronomy. Are you tempted to work at this, given the prize of ten grand?
Two weekends ago I was able to step away from worship leadership at Bridge St. UC and catch my breath...well, sort of. One of the days I was in Kingston helping pack in preparation for my elderly mother's move to a new care facility. The following day we traveled to Perth for a visit with Ruth's beloved step-sister who has been fighting the good fight with cancer. Then we spent time with long-time friends north of Sharbot Lake who have sold their farm on the Mississippi River. Ruth helped clean up the chicken coop while I was doing the same in the workshop...glamorous stuff!
After we left our friends' farm I was aware of how much I would miss our visits there. This couple have been wonderful friends for more than thirty years, beginning as active members of my second pastoral charge. They are like family in so many ways. That relationship will continue, but the farm became almost holy ground for us.
Why? Well, we have enjoyed the connection with small-scale agriculture and we bought beef, lamb, chickens, eggs, honey from them, knowing that they had a commitment to treating their critters ethically. Yup, even the bees.
There was hardly a time there when we didn't see wildlife, whether it was deer, or wild turkeys, or otters, or loons. During one winter visit wolves were on the ice of the river, not far from the house. Our friends have had to contend with predators who see their livestock as a buffet table, but it is an encouraging reminder that wild things flourish in our province.
Two of the greatest gifts have been silence and darkness. We marveled at the quiet in a culture that has largely conceded quiet for convenience. The soundscape of the farm included noises from the barnyard, including the tractor, but we were regularly aware of an almost palpable silence as we walked the property. At night we made a point of looking to the sky and when it was clear the Milky Way was almost always evident.
One other gift of our visits has been a technology Sabbath, as least with our phones. Because they are in a valley surrounded by plenty of rock there is no cell coverage. We know the spot along Highway 7 where we will inform our adult kids that we are about to disappear unless they use a landline. That has become its own blessing.
For both of us all these aspects of the farm, along with the river and the rolling hills have restored our souls.
Pope Contradicts Genesis Account of Creation, Argues ‘God and Evolution’ Are Compatible
This was the headline in a recent Christian News Network piece about a recent gathering in Rome. Strangely the article goes on to quote the pope accurately. Rather than offering a contradictory assessment of creation, Pope Francis offers that the two are compatible and therefore not contradictory:
The Roman Catholic Pontiff Francis addressed an audience at the Pontifical Academy of Sciences on Monday, during which he reaffirmed long-held Catholic beliefs that evolution is not “inconsistent” with Creation. “When we read about Creation in Genesis, we run the risk of imagining God was a magician, with a magic wand able to do everything. But that is not so,” he told those gathered for a discussion on “Evolving Concepts of Nature.” “He created human beings and let them develop according to the internal laws that he gave to each one so they would reach their fulfillment.”
“And so Creation continued for centuries and centuries, millennia and millennia, until it became which we know today, precisely because God is not a demiurge or a magician, but the Creator who gives being to all things,” Francis continued. “The Big Bang, which today we hold to be the origin of the world, does not contradict the intervention of the divine creator but, rather, requires it. … Evolution in nature is not inconsistent with the notion of creation, because evolution requires the creation of beings that evolve.”
The article goes on to quote the chief Vatican astronomer Guy Consolmagno:
The papal astronomer further explained that he rejects the literal interpretation of Genesis and instead finds truth through “science.” “Science is a way of getting close to creation, to really getting intimate with creation, and it’s a way of getting intimate with the Creator,” he claimed. “It’s an act of worship.”
At the end of the article the Christian News Network quotes a creationist proponent who takes this as evidence of the Roman Catholic church moving away from biblical faith rather than offering a broader view. It really is rather sad, or infuriating -- take your pick.
When Jian Ghomeshi took over the morning spot on CBC radio once held by the marvelous, irascible Peter Gzowski I was not impressed. I felt that Sheila Rogers was Gzowski's obvious replacement. But Ghomeshi forged a new identity for that slot with the program called Q, and he has proved to be an excellent interviewer with an international audience. He has also done well in creating a strong fan-base of younger listeners. Maybe too well.
Over the weekend Ghomeshi was fired by the CBC, despite being such a big success. The picture is emerging of a dismissal based on Ghomeshi's exotic sexual proclivities. He admits on Facebook that he is adventurous in pursuing sexual relationships which include bondage and role-playing and other activities which once fell into the category of kinky.
I still think they are kinky, but I was a little surprised by the firing. After all, this was Ghomeshi's private life. Since then we have heard allegations made by several women that this sex was not consensual and that it involved physical violence that was not expected. Ghomeshi's response has been that he did nothing wrong because it was consensual, and that it wasn't illegal. He has launched a $55 million lawsuit against the CBC. Curiously, the lawsuit alleges that the CBC made a moral judgment, apparently a serious mistake in our society. But aren't "right and wrong" moral judgments about behaviour and activity? So if you haven't done anything wrong...?"
One legal expert has offered his opinion that the lawsuit isn't likely to stand up because their is a grievance process at the CBC which hasn't been explored first. Another expert points out that there is no such thing as consensual violence in Canada. Doing physical harm to another is against the law, regardless of the willingness of parties to be involved.
Then there is the creepy factor. If the allegations are true, this situation resonates with what we often hear in domestic violence situations, where one partner insists that the other was an active and willing participant in what transpires. Lawyers sometimes argue this when cases come to court. And in domestic assault situations the victim is often reluctant to come forward because of the shame, the damage to personal reputation, and fear of repercussions as the allegations are discredited. Add to this that the women in this instance seem to be young enough to be Jian's daughters, at least biologically.
Dare I add that even though we live in a society where traditional boundaries are blurred, there is nothing about this that sounds like love In our Judeo-Christian tradition our sexual expression, even when it is playful and adventurous, is grounded in love and mutual respect and tenderness. I don't hear much about that in this situation.
Well, I'm curious to know how you have responded to this unfolding story. Thoughts?
On Saturday we moved my elderly mother from her "independent living" residence to a facility where she will receive greater care. She went reluctantly but her health has been in steady decline for a couple of years and an incident which landed her in the hospital emergency ward galvanized us to make the decision. We have been doing our best to be respectful and including Mom in the decision-making process. But as so many of us realize along the way, we are responsible for making certain choices on behalf of those who are unable to do so for themselves. Mom has Parkinson's Disease which affects movement and speech and eventually memory. Virtually every aspect of daily life has become a monumental task, so now she will have help with these things.
The change of venue was actually a physical trip of one kilometre. But it meant leaving behind the people she has come to know over the past five years and the familiarity of her residence and apartment. This new space is lovely, but smaller, representing her shrinking world.
My brother lives nearby and has been extraordinary in preparing for the move, painstakingly going through the accumulated mementos of nearly 89 years. And she hasn't wanted to relinquish a single thing! We hope we have held on to the highlights of her remarkable life, one of courage and faith. In her new room she is surrounded by familiar furniture and art.
What I hope is that as her strength and memory dims, she is still aware of the God who sustains her. As we left yesterday I knelt down and took her hand and said "God be with you Mom." Her answer was "he always has been."
Today our Bridge St. congregation will take a moment in worship to honour the deaths of two Canadian soldiers, Patrice Vincent and Nathan Cirillo. I imagine this will happen in many churches across the country. Their senseless, cowardly murders are shocking and an affront to all Canadians. We have heard from many Islamic leaders who feel the same way. Even though the murderers had associated themselves with mosques, leading to them being described as "radicalized Muslim converts" I don't believe they were Muslims in any real sense.
When Anders Breivik killed scores of young people in Norway in 2011 he claimed to be a Christian, but it became obvious that he was using the term Christian to justify his paranoia and rage. I don't recall him being described as a "radicalized Christian." No one asked me to disclaim his actions in my role as a Christian pastor. But that is what has happened for the Muslim community.
As the vast majority of North American Muslims live peaceful, integrated lives within their communities, a handful of disaffected, angry young men hide behind Islam to justify their violence. In both cases last week the murderers appear to be unhappy loners who had become bitter and deranged. Member of the mosques they frequented did their best to challenge their distorted views. They weren't successful, but neither were the families of these men.
I feel that the greatest service we can offer to law-abiding Muslims in this country is to refuse to identify these perpetrators of violence with any religion.
Yesterday morning I listened to a Jewish woman named Sara Zeldman speak on CBC radio with great enthusiasm about a project, a celebration really. It is called The Shabbat Project and it sounds wonderful. Here is the link to the conversation with host Matt Galloway http://www.cbc.ca/metromorning/episodes/2014/10/24/celebrating-together/ Ms Zeldman spoke of Shabbat, or the Sabbath, as an antidote to the frenetic busyness of life.
I found a description elsewhere which is helpful as well:
The Shabbat Project is a global grassroots initiative to foster Jewish unity and celebration worldwide on Oct. 24-25, 2014. The entire Jewish community in the Greater Toronto Area is invited to participate in a Shabbat experience together as a community.
Unplug. Recharge: · Some people are hosting large meals with their neighbours throughout the city. Many community organizations and synagogues are running full-blown Shabbatons with speakers and special programming. · Several organizations are hosting large meals and providing sleeping accommodations so that people have an opportunity to celebrate Shabbat in its entirety together as a community.
Some people choose to celebrate Shabbat in their own home with a ‘Do-It-Yourself Kit’ from The Shabbat Project. The Shabbat Project Toronto encourages all Jews from all walks of life to celebrate our unity on this incredible weekend as a community and to use this weekend to
Stop. Rest. Enjoy. with family and community removing the usual distractions.
Okay, I will concede that I am a sucker for stories such as this one. I believe in the power of religion to bring people together and to appeal to a higher good for all because God is at work in our midst. We know that religion can be divisive and tribal, but the stories of reconciliation and hope tend to get pushed into the background.
After the recent Scottish referendum a service of healing held at St. Giles Church in Edinburgh. The lead up to the referendum was a time of heightened emotions and hard feelings at times, because of what was at stake. The service brought together political leaders from both the yes and no sides, and it was attended by 1,000 people.
In his sermon, Rt Rev John Chalmers spoke about the referendum being a
"momentous time" which resulted in some being elated and relieved, and
others being desperately disappointed. He invited the worshippers to act with
"magnanimity and graciousness to restore equilibrium" and come together for a
common good - the future of Scotland.
Of course there were people who sniffed at the value of such a service. Others came specifically because of the opportunity for reconciliation.
Does this sound like a good idea to you? Should we be creating more occasions to bring together in hope?
Last week we hosted long-time friends who were passing through on their way to a university reunion. These are active United Church laypeople and she is the sort of engaged, thoughtful Christian whose leadership skills would be an asset in any congregation. I have always found her positive and ready to face the challenges and changes of church life.
During our evening chat we realized how hurt and even angry she is about the recent departure of their minister. The minister announced her departure without warning after only a few years with them. She was admired by the flock and was offering innovative and meaningful worship leadership. So why would she leave, and not give the congregation a chance to negotiate through concerns? No one including the Board chair and Ministry and Personnel committee were aware of what was unfolding. I could tell our friend took this personally, as a form of betrayal in a way, and I can understand why. That is often the feeling, even after long pastorates.
At the same time I know the situation in the congregation well, and it is a demanding place to be. It is just a complicated ministry which requires constant vigilance and problem-solving. The minister probably felt that it was easier to leave and start again. It certainly wasn't for greener pastures, and the folk she left are really good people. But in these complicated times it can be difficult to see a way forward for clergy.
As I listened I figured everyone had lost something. I am sure Christ is still present in the congregation, but their loss of leadership is significant. The minister is a person of abiding faith who will take her gifts elsewhere. But there are many casualties in these unsettled times for the church, and it all seems rather unfair.I'm sure that most people have little idea how bewildered many clergy feel as they attempt to preach and live the Good News in times which seem to be really bad news.
Have you gone through a similar experience of loss? It is wrong to be hurt by a minister's departure or is it just one of the realities of grief?
Once again there is controversy in Israel over the claim of some Jewish women to equality in worship and expression of their faith. The latest stir came as ads were posted on buses by the group Women of the Wall, which seeks to achieve equality at the Western Wall, the holiest place where Jews can pray. The advertisements showed girls and women wearing prayer shawls and holding a Torah scroll — rituals seen by many Orthodox Jews as reserved for men only. Many of the signs have been vandalized because they promote Bat Mitzvah ceremonies for girls at the Western Wall. The coming-of-age ceremonies for girls are only allowed to be held at a nearby prayer site, designated for worshippers who don’t follow the orthodox tradition.
Every time I see stories such as these I'm startled, and I'm aware that we are still a long way from equality, in no small part because of fundamentalist religion. It certainly isn't exclusive to Judaism, or Islam for that matter. I follow threads of conversations on Twitter in which Christian women are attacked viciously for claiming equality with men. Many denominations still do not ordain women nor recognize their calls to ministry in other that secondary roles. It is so far from the current experience in the United Church, with women in virtually every leadership role, although there are still inequalities in opportunity in our denomination.
Do you remember times when women were restricted in their leadership opportunities, or viewed as second-class to men? Do you feel that there is equality in your denomination now, or are there still "glass ceilings?"
We've been having a worthwhile discussion in our Bridge St. Governance Board about how we get the message of our Christian community out to the wider community which is Belleville. The words "marketing" and "branding" have come up regularly. Some folk like 'em, because they are using them on a regular basis, and others don't, because they smack of commercialism and selling a product.
Of course those who promote branding argue persuasively that it is way of establishing values and identity which are then shared with a target audience through marketing. What we are realizing in the church is that we have rather smugly assumed that everyone in our culture knows who we are and what we stand for. Unfortunately this is far from true, so our image is shaped by absence. In a time when so many carry around a shopping cart crammed with negativity about organized religion we have failed to share our good news, which is all the positive ways we are responding to the Good News of Jesus Christ.
Our oldest daughter, Jocelyn, gave me a book for my birthday called Branding for Nonprofits: Developing Identity with Integrity. The title sure works for me. The author, DK Holland has developed four branding markers:
Reputation: How well is the brand known by audiences?
Esteem: How highly do its audiences rate the brand?
Relevance: How much do the brand’s audiences care about what it does or stands for?
Differentiation: How different is the brand from others? Are other brands similar?
A recent issue of the United Church Observer shared poll results that found most Canadians don't have any more than a vague clue about our denomination, so both our branding and marketing have failed. The United Church offers an alternative to more right-leaning theology, but we haven't conveyed our commitment to social change, inclusivity, and a heart/mind Christian theology. Closer to home, many of our folk at Bridge St. are frustrated that we have a reputation as the hoighty-toighty church, where the rich and arrogant hang out together. My 18-month experience as pastor here is of warm, caring, thoughtful people who have a meaningful faith and want to deepen it through worship. Again, we apparently haven't done our work effectively when it comes to branding or marketing.
At least we're talking about it! Now we have to do it, even if we don't use the B and M words. We could call it evangelizing, another word which makes mainliners uncomfortable, but we really do need to get over that reluctance, it seems to me.
What about you? Are you okay with terms such as branding and marketing? How about evangelizing? If not these three, how do we describe the important work of getting our message and Christ's message out there?
We have been sickened by the barbarism of ISIS/ISIL executions of Westerners in the past couple of months. None of these murders has made sense, but the recent killing of a man from Great Britain, Alan Henning, who was in Syria to provide aid to suffering children was especially atrocious. I find I must fight back my fury each time because of the sheer cowardice.
Because of the international outrage a number of nations, including Canada, have gone to war against these terrorists, in what is to me an ill-defined mission. I also find it bizarre that Saudi Arabia is part of this coalition because a principal form of capital punishment for the kingdom is beheading. Since the beginning of 2014 approximately seventy people have died this way, often for crimes which would receive moderate sentences in many of the other coalition nations. These beheadings happen publicly, as Saudi Arabia is one of several nations which hold public executions.
This isn't the only form of brutal execution in the world. We are reasonably sure that China executes some criminals by a gunshot to the head, and not necessarily by firing squad. There are nations, including Saudi Arabia, which still crucify convicted criminals.
While we may view all this as barbaric, recent incidents in the United States of botched executions by lethal injection have led to new discussions and protests against capital punishment. How does this happen in a country where so many claim Christian values? It wasn't that long ago that capital punishment was an option in Canada, although we can thank God that it hasn't been applied in more than fifty years.
The history of movements to abolish capital punishment has included many Christians who have worked tirelessly and effectively to bring it to an end. We agree that actual criminals must be held accountable for their actions, and we should feel outrage at terrorist acts. But executions for any reason should be called into question in civil and enlightened societies.
Could you give me a minute to search through all the scripture passages on physician-assisted suicide. Okay, done. There are none. This is part of the challenge for those of us from the Judeo-Christian tradition in regard to assisted suicide.
The bible gives us the broad strokes of the sanctity of life, human and non-human. Christianity has developed a theology and ethic of the preciousness of life which challenged infanticide in Roman culture. This led to a strong stance in the Roman Catholic church and most evangelical denominations on abortion as well. And many denominations have taken stands against suicide of any kind, sometimes claiming that heaven's doors will be blocked to those who take their own lives.
Why then has the discussion on assisted suicide moved to the foreground of society, including this week's debate in Canada's parliament? In part it has to do with our changing convictions about individual choice. There is another reality though, which is our increasing lifespans. In developed nations we are living longer than our forbearers. When I was born in 1954 life expectancy was roughly 68 in Canada. Sixty years on it is 82, and we are one of the top nations for longevity in the world.
Unfortunately, living long doesn't necessarily mean living well. Even those with access to the best medical services and palliative care may conclude that live is no longer worth living because of severe physical restrictions, mental anguish, or pain. There have been a number of high-profile challenges to Canadian laws on suicide in recent years, and it's hard to imagine not being touched by the plight and desire of these individuals.
Again this past week we entered into the debate, which always presses us to ask what the parameters for assisted suicide might be, how we will protect those most vulnerable in our society, and who will be the gatekeepers and technicians for this form of death.
Rather than saying anything more, I encourage you to read and reflect. It is so important for Canadians to be informed on this subject, because we are at an important crossroads. We can also pray for all those who are in the final stages of this life and desire a "good death," which is what euthanasia means.
Our son Isaac is a United Church minister but because he works in a team he had the Thanksgiving Weekend off and his family could join us for the weekend. They were present for worship at Bridge St. Church and Ike brought grandson Nicholas, who is almost two, forward for the Children's Time. I wasn't prepared for the wave of emotion I experienced seeing him in his Dad's arms. It was only the other day that our three children were coming to the front for the same moment in the service, or so it seems. I am so proud of all three of them as adults and it was lovely to have them and their partners with us on Saturday to celebrate my birthday. While with us Isaac picked up a plastic tote my brother had with papers related to my father's life. Both my father and his brother were United Church ministers, and both have been gone for a number of years. Later on Thanksgiving Monday Isaac texted me from home. He had discovered in his rummaging that Dad, his grandfather, had been ordained at Bridge St. in 1954, just a few months before my birth.
I knew that my father, George Mundy, had been ordained in Bay of Quinte Conference. I had no idea where, and of course he died long before my move to Belleville. Yet here I am, serving in the congregation where his ministry was inaugurated. The United Church is certainly very different now from the denomination of the post-war years and from the church into which I was ordained in 1980. The clergy of Isaac's generation are the courageous ones.
I believe this is where I'm supposed to burst into a chorus of The Circle of Life! Actually, this news, shared in a couple of lines of a text message, has been a constant companion in the few days since. I'm not sure why, but is seems like an unusual coincidence -- or is that providence. I'm grateful that my son was curious to find out more about his family history. I might never have known otherwise. Perhaps God just wanted me to be aware.
Oh yes, Bridge St. UC has been approached to host the Celebration of Ministry service at Bay of Quinte Conference in 2015.
During November we will engage in conversation around Sara Miles' provocative and worthwhile book called Take This Bread. Miles was an avowed atheist who became a Christian passionately involved in the food ministry in her congregation. Bridge St. United Church has two important meal ministries. One is called Inn from the Cold and it provides hot, sit-down meals during a six-week period in the coldest part of the winter. Thank God It's Friday is a once-a-week distribution of frozen meals. These ministries combine to provide over 8,000 meals with 150 volunteers involved. I think the work is impressive,
Still, one of the questions we need to ask is why we do this as a congregation. Another is what meal distribution contributes to the bigger challenge of food security for those who are at the margins of our affluent society. The metaphor of rescuing children repeatedly from a raging river without ever asking what is happening upstream to put them there is apt. We don't want to be involved in meal distribution to assuage our consciences, nor do we want them to be a bandaid for the real wounds of those who need systemic change.
Today volunteers in 12 cities will hand out paper bags with the words Chew on This!, as well as a postcard describing the food security or insecurity situation in Canada. This is the International Day for the Eradication of Poverty. The hope is that the federal government will create a plan for poverty elimination through a number of prongs, but there have been plenty of plans put forward by different levels of government through the decades which have been stillborn.
As I have said before, I think it is hopeful that different agencies including congregational food ministries are coming together in Belleville to develop their own strategies for support and advocacy.
Any comments about the meal ministries offered at Bridge St. and other congregations? Today meals will be distributed here, with grateful recipients. Have you been involved in developing any "bigger picture" strategies in your community to support those who struggle to eat well? Is this as aspect of our Christian faith and commitment to justice?
More than 200 Roman Catholic bishops gathered in Rome this week for a Synod on Family that some are comparing to Vatican II. Why? Well the discussion will address core teachings of the Catholic church, including marriage, contraception, abortion, divorce, and homosexuality.
In his opening Pope Francis urged these bishops not to impose what he called "intolerable moral burdens"
on believers. While there are RC's who are encouraged that this is one more step along a road that Francis has invited the faithful to travel toward greater openness and tolerance, others are in wait-and-see mode. Conversation isn't the same as a change in doctrine and there are conservative bishops who are already expressing opposition to the tenor of the discussions.
Here is the section on homosexuality. Welcoming homosexual persons
50. Homosexuals have gifts and qualities to offer to the Christian community: are we capable of welcoming these people, guaranteeing to them a fraternal space in our communities? Often they wish to encounter a Church that offers them a welcoming home. Are our communities capable of providing that, accepting and valuing their sexual orientation, without compromising Catholic doctrine on the family and matrimony? 51. The question of homosexuality leads to a serious reflection on how to elaborate realistic paths of affective growth and human and evangelical maturity integrating the sexual dimension: it appears therefore as an important educative challenge. The Church furthermore affirms that unions between people of the same sex cannot be considered on the same footing as matrimony between man and woman. Nor is it acceptable that pressure be brought to bear on pastors or that international bodies make financial aid dependent on the introduction of regulations inspired by gender ideology. 52. Without denying the moral problems connected to homosexual unions it has to be noted that there are cases in which mutual aid to the point of sacrifice constitutes a precious support in the life of the partners. Furthermore, the Church pays special attention to the children who live with couples of the same sex, emphasizing that the needs and rights of the little ones must always be given priority.
You may be thinking that this is hardly radical change or that the Roman Catholic church speaks out of both sides of its ecclesial mouth. I do hope that this is movement toward the Christian embrace of so many who have felt excluded and alienated by the church they have loved and often served. It's not just about the LGBTQ community. I have friends and acquaintances who have been ostracized over issues of divorce and remarriage and have never recovered.
What do you think about this Synod or do you care?
Monday Canadians celebrated Thanksgiving while in the US it was Columbus Day. As the name suggests, this is the day Americans have traditionally celebrated the discovery of the Americas by Christopher Columbus and the crews of three ships commissioned for the voyage. Of course First Nations people, the Vikings, and the Irish would all beg to differ. When Columbus arrived, searching for India, he discovered lands inhabited by developed cultures which had been established on the continent for thousands of years. With typical European hubris these cultures were dismissed as heathen and savage, and often decimated or exterminated. The church was often complicit in the twisted rational which allowed the inhabitants to be slaughtered because they weren't Christian.
It is an ugly history to be sure and celebrating Columbus as a hero doesn't make a whole lot of sense. Some cities have decided not to call the day after Columbus, instead renaming it as Indigenous People's Day. A piece on the NPR websites reports on what has happened in Seattle:
"This is about taking a stand against racism and discrimination," Seattle City Council member Kshama Sawant told the Seattle Times. "Learning about the history of Columbus and transforming this day into a celebration of indigenous people and a celebration of social justice ... allows us to make a connection between this painful history and the ongoing marginalization, discrimination and poverty that indigenous communities face to this day."
Slowly but surely we are waking up to the pervasive and persistent wrongs of subjugation. We have learned to say we're sorry, although sincerity is sometimes in question. We are realizing that many of the long-standing nicknames and mascots for sports teams are offensive, although owners and fans are slow to relinquish them. Think of the Washington Redskins and the "tomahawk chop" for the Atlanta Braves.
When the 500th anniversary of Columbus' arrival was recognized in 1992 in began with a bang and ended with a whimper. I wonder if it would have happened at all with today's awareness?
Let's pray --literally-- for a continuing change of perception everywhere, including in the church.
Last week I read Ian McEwen's latest novel, The Children Act. McEwen is a deft writer and in this book he explores the role of society in both protecting the vulnerable and ensuring the greater good. The story focuses on a court case in which a family of Jehovah's Witnesses wants the right of choice for the seventeen-year-old son to refuse a blood transfusion. The young man has leukaemia and without the transfusion he will die. The story is told from the perspective of the judge who must rule in this complicated case. There are issues of religious freedom and the grey area of the son's age. He does not want the transfusion but is still a minor, by a few months. I won't spoil the story by spilling the beans on the outcome, which is not predictable.
In the same week we heard about an aboriginal family which refused chemotherapy for an eleven-year-old daughter, Jada, insisting that they would follow traditional ways rather than introduce poison to the child's body. Doctors were convinced that the therapy would likely save the girl's life, but the family said no, then disappeared, probably to the States. There is a religious or spiritual element to this story as well.
When does the state have the right to make these decisions? And what happens when individuals or families insist that saying no to treatment is a freedom based on religion? I think that there are times when the best interests of the person, particularly children, trumps religion, if it means saving a life.
I wish I could claim this clever post title as my own but it is actually from an article in the Daily Beast about a memoir by former crematorium worker, Caitlin Doughty called Smoke Gets in Your Eyes. Doughty has been on YouTube for a while with an often funny, very practical series called Ask a Mortician.https://www.youtube.com/user/OrderoftheGoodDeath
As the article offers: "Doughty is the founder of The Order of the Good Death, a group of death-industry professionals, academics, and artists exploring ways to prepare a death phobic culture for their inevitable mortality." http://www.orderofthegooddeath.com/ Good for Doughty, and others who are coming up with creative ways to acquaint people with the reality of death. As I've said before, I feel that death is highly overrated, and I'm generally against it, even though I'm a resurrection guy. Still, we all die, whether we want to contemplate it or not. This used to be the role of the church. More and more it has become the ballywick of the funeral industry, which can sometimes, although certainly not always, sanitize death. You may have read my previous rants about how funeral and memorial services have often become death-denying events where participants act as though no one has died.
Be honest, are you in death-denial? Do you find that it's hard to have a discussion about death with loved ones? Are you glad that Doughty and others are addressing death head-on? Should Christians be more open to talking death than others?
Today people most will enter Bridge St. Church from the Church St. door rather than the Bridge St. door. The Bridge St. entrance is our through-the-week business door. People come and go from the office and enter for meetings and events.
The Bridge St door is also the one through which folk enter for our Thank God It's Friday meal distribution program and for the six weeks of Inn from the Cold in January and February. This would be the "poor door" to us Heidi Neumark's term in a recent Christian Century article. She observes that that there is class separation in many congregations doing worthwhile social service work. She speaks of the front-door people and side-door people and I was jolted by her descriptions because they are true. She is too close to home when she says that many churches are involved in social service rather than social change.
I am now serving my fourth congregation with a significant meal program. The 8000+ meals of the meal ministries at Bridge St. are remarkable. There are more than 150 volunteers who impress me no end. I have always wondered if we create two congregations with these outreach ministries and what Jesus is calling us to do.
As I was writing this on Friday a young guy came to the door seeking financial help for baby formula. We have a fair number of people with a variety of woes and needs. Again, our congregation is very generous to our Benevolent Fund. But we rarely see any of the folk we assist through the week on Sundays and I understand why they don't come.
This Thanksgiving I will ponder this some more. Is Christ's calling us to move beyond side-door and front-door congregations? The gospel message doesn't have two doors. What would that be like for us?
When I began ministry 35 years ago my first pastoral charge was in very rural Newfoundland. At the time the United Church was involved in a boycott of Nestlé's products because this international corporate giant was actively involved in convincing women in developing nations to forego breast-feeding and purchase Nestle powdered infant formula instead. This was represented as better for the babies but it wasn't. The mothers were often using contaminated water and adding more than indicated to stretch the formula, therefore inadvertently poisoning their children and causing malnutrition. Babies were dying of diarrhea and other intestinal diseases.
I was pleasantly surprised that my earnest efforts to convince folk in the five outports I served actually worked. At that time just about everyone used Nestlé's tinned milk in their tea, a practice that left the drinkers' teeth feeling as though they had been broadloomed! Lots of people told me they had switched to another manufacturer, which was really encouraging until I found out that despite the different name the alternative company was a Nestlé's subsidiary.
I thought of this modest attempt at justice when I saw recently that a film has been made about the life of the Nestlé's formula salesman-turned-whistleblower who now lives in Mississauga and works as a taxi-driver. Syed Aamir Raza Hussain (above) sold the formula until a doctor in Pakistan took him into a hospital ward of malnourished babies and explained what was happening. This was in the 1990's, years after the World Health Assembly passed the “International Code for the Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes.” Hussain quit his job and eventually produced a report called Milking Profits in which he decries the practices of Nestlé's to promote infant formula by giving "gifts" to doctors and other health officials to do so.
Life has been difficult for Hussain ever since he decided to speak out about his former employer and he was nearly deported from Canada along the way. Now there is a film on Hussain's efforts called Tigers which was screened at TIFF in September. His story is finally being told.
Do any of you recall this boycott? Do you find it discouraging to hear what has transpired, both in the circumvention of the Code and what has happened for Hussain? Here's hoping that the film will make a difference.
Canada is off to war again, although we don't seem to want to call it that. The cowards and killers of IS, ISIS, ISIL -- so many letters!-- are the target. This decision of parliament is tied to the debate about national security, the possibility that terror could come to our cities and towns. In the words of Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird:
“This is not just another conflict. The struggle is not against a state or even a foreign dictator. This is a struggle against a group of terrorists that rape and pillage and slaughter anything and anyone that stands in their way. These terrorist are creating a proto-state, a place where they can train for attacks against Canada and the West.” I don't disagree with Mr. Baird about the terrible crimes committed by this group. I am not so sure that even a concerted military action will be the answer. While some of them will be "degraded and destroyed" there isn't a scrap of evidence that terrorism can be extinguished this way. I realize that I am in the minority of Canadians in this regard.
I am also trying to think and pray my way through the "fear factor," the notion that we must destroy these terrorists in Iraq and Syria to keep them from our shores. I have no doubt that people, mostly young men, are being radicalized in Canada and contemplating terrorist acts. But how does killing terrorists in the Middle East stop "born and bred" terrorists doing their worst here? And are we being manipulated into compliance by fear?
I have two daughters who work in Toronto and so do their partners. One of them works very close to the site where an incendiary device was detected and detonated in downtown TO last November. I try not to be anxious about where they go about their daily lives and what might happen. I also do my best not to have my opinions shaped by the unfocussed rhetoric of "security." We know that in the past this has led individuals and nations into decisions which weren't based on reality. We have incarcerated whole groups of people without good reason and we have entered into conflicts with no clear purpose and at huge cost, including the loss of our military personnel.
I hope we will engage in prayer for decisions based on facts and truth, not fear.
So when you are offering your gift at the altar, if you remember that your brother or sister has something against you, leave your gift there before the altar and go; first be reconciled to your brother or sister, and then come and offer your gift.
Come to terms quickly with your accuser while you are on the way to court with him, or your accuser may hand you over to the judge, and the judge to the guard, and you will be thrown into prison.Matthew 5:23-25
We have watched the television drama, The Good Wife, regularly and avidly for several years. This show cleverly interweaves politics and law and relationships. it is well-acted and while the plot-line has dragged at times, the producers and writers keep re-inventing. One critic observed recently that The Good Wife might be a cynical social commentary because corruption and deception abounds and even the supposedly good people, including "good wife" Alicia, can be rather shady in their dealings.
This past week the show got religion, not for the first time, but with an interesting turn. One of Alicia's firm's clients owns a corporation which produces GMO seeds. He takes a farmer to court for illegally planting seeds harvested from his own crop. As strange as that may sound, proprietary rights for seed rests with the company which has the patent in both the States and Canada.
These two men are actually neighbours and both are Christians, so they decide to leave the courtroom and settle their dispute through biblically-based arbitration called The Matthew Process. It is based on the teaching of Jesus as found in what is often called the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew, chapter five.
The lawyers are still involved, so they begin searching scripture to make their points. Atheist Alicia turns to her teenage daughter Grace, who has become a Christian through friends. It turns out that Grace has developed a mature approach to scripture, gently admonishing her mother for "proof-texting," cherry-picking verses out of context. When Alicia asks Grace whether she really believes the bible, she admits that she doesn't take it all literally, but offers that it can be "true in another way." Alicia is impressed and so was I. It is rare to see anything but cartoonish portrayals of Christians and the bible on television.
Eventually the two adversaries choose to act on their Christian faith and reconcile, the way Jesus invites us to do. Go figure!
Does this plot-line surprise you in this rather anti-religious climate? Are you going to find the episode (it is "on demand")?
We are awaiting the release of the film Wild, based on the best-selling autobiography Wild: From Lost to Found on the Pacific Crest Trail by Cheryl Strayed and starring Reese Witherspoon. The story is one of self-discovery along the demanding 1,100 miles West Coast Trail. At age 26 Strayed's life was adrift, having experienced the death of her mother and making choices which were destructive. She set out on this lengthy hike which became what might have been called a pilgrimage in another time. Some critics are saying that this is Witherspoon's best acting since Walk the Line, while others who are less kind suggest that she has chosen a role calculated to bring her an Oscar nomination. I haven't read the book, but it sounds like a very readable exploration of what the rigours of an outward, physical, even dangerous journey can bring to the inner, spiritual journey.
The film won't be released until early December, but all this talk about Wild coincides with a traditional pilgrimage, the Hajj. More than two million Muslim pilgrims will made their way to Mecca in Saudi Arabia, between October 2nd and 7th. The name "hajj" means the intention of a journey, which is as important as the destination.
Despite the tradition, and the organization, this pilgrimage always has its own dangers. That many people brought together for what is one of the largest human gathering on the planet jostle and stumble and there have been fatal stampedes through the years. I listened to a young Canadian woman who attended two years ago and she spoke of the training she went through here to prepare her for the challenges of being in large crowds. This year there is the added concern of Ebola, since many pilgrims are from Africa.
There is a long tradition of Christian pilgrimage which includes journeys to Canterbury, Jerusalem and Rome. The Camino in Spain has regained popularity in recent decades and our son Isaac, as well as a couple of friends, have made this 800+ kilometer walk to Santiago de Compostela.
Do you think there is a connection between Cheryl Strayed's individual journey of self-discovery and the collective pilgrimage of the Hajj? Have you ever been on a trip that was an intentional pilgrimage, or became one as you travelled? Does this notion of a pilgrimage appeal to you, or would you prefer to lie down until the feeling goes away?
Wait for The Lord. Be strong and let your heart take courage. Wait for The Lord.” –Psalm 27:14
Last week I made the earliest appointment possible to have my vehicle undercoated, in preparation for winter. I wanted to get to work at a regular hour, and I did. I was reminded once again that men of a certain age seem to be earnest about tasks such as undercoating. I was one of several grey-hairs in the office, either waiting or setting up appointments. Fortunately they got me in earlier than my specified time and out rather quickly.
I don't like waiting, for anything. I hate drive-throughs, in part for environmental reasons. For events such as the Toronto International Film Festival I will endure a line-up, but I'm a mildly grumpy wait-er. We have waited dozens of times through the years for ferries to various destinations, but no amount of pacing will speed up the arrival or departure of the ship.
I waited for the birth of our three children, and one grandchild, always a bit fretful about what will occur during delivery, and then filled with relief and joy. I have kept vigil with families as a sick or elderly loved one lay dying, and I have done my best to be a "non-anxious presence" as we watched life ebb away. In those occasions we have prayed and asked God to be the source of calm and peace as the person moved from this life to the next.
There are many scripture passages which exhort us toward what we might call Godly waiting, an openness and willingness to live beyond impatience because the One who loves us and redeems us is at hand.
I like the little prayer below by Elisa Cottrell. It addresses so much in a matter of a few phrases.