Today we will baptize a baby in worship, infant baptism being the usual although not exclusive practice of the United Church. Some denominations baptize adults only and consider us to be somewhat inferior Christians for sprinkling infants. We argue that there are stories in scripture describing baptism of entire households or families, so wouldn't that include kids? In fact, coincidence or providence offers up one of those stories within the lectionary readings this week.
We take on the responsibility of being the extended family of the children we baptize, not unlike the communal child-rearing in places like Namibia. The difficulty is that while some families seek baptism and we make our promises, we don't get much of a chance to be the village that raises a child. I know some parents figure that they will get around to church, but why bother until then? To add to the discussion, take a look at this article in the New York Times on the moral life of babies http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/09/magazine/09babies-t.html
Is baptism meaningful for you? Do you take your promises seriously? Should we even bother in this day of rampant individualism, or should we just wait for adult commitment as with other churches?
Yes, yes and definitely yes! I cannot think of what my life would be if my parents had not made that early promise to raise me in a Christian environment with the help of the church community.
ReplyDeletePerhaps William James (referring to your link) made a slight miscalculation and was supposed to find that it was as one ages that our mental life becomes “one great blooming, buzzing confusion" when it comes to the sense of right and wrong and the decisions we make.
I'm glad you responded Not Alone. I appreciate your triple affirmation, and the thought of blooming, buzzing confusion. I find myself in that state regularly!
ReplyDelete