In The Third of May, 1808, along with its companion work The Second of May, 1808, Goya sought to commemorate Spanish resistance to Napoleon's armies during the occupation of 1808. Both were produced in 1814, while the print series was in progress.
1 Beneath the cross of Jesus
I fain would take my stand:
the shadow of a mighty rock
within a weary land,
a home within the wilderness,
a rest upon the way,
from the burning of the noontide heat
and the burden of the day.
Francisco Goya was a Spanish painter and printmaker who worked in the latter 18th and early 19th centuries. He became a sought after artist by the influential people of his time and created idyllic scenes along with a couple of controversial nudes for a government official. Later in his career Goya created a series of grim prints called The Disasters of War which graphically portray scenes related to the French invasion of Spain and the atrocities of that conflict.
Earlier this week I thought about a stark Goya painting from that same time period called The Third of May, 1808 which depict the execution of Spanish insurgents by French soldiers. This work came to mind because of the stunning news that the Pentagon under Pete Hegseth had decided to put a former military officer, a mass killer to death by firings squad, a form of execution not employed since 1945. The controversy over this choice was deepened with the additional announcement that the execution would be live-streamed for any and all to watch.
Thank God that there was an immediate outcry about this barbaric spectacle with both Roman Catholic bishops and Evangelical Leaders making strong statements in opposition, along with other denominations. Many politicians on both sides of the aisle condemned the live-streaming, although not necessarily the execution. A poll found that about 80% of Americans were against the live-streaming and soon after it's release President Trump, who was initially in support, decided that it wouldn't happen. This is politically expedient when the mid-term elections are just around the corner.
How did bloodlust become so deeply rooted in a segment of this society that the notion would even be entertained? Hegseth constantly huffs and puffs about his own Christian faith and maintains that America is a Christian nation. Has he ever read the teachings of Jesus or given serious thought to Jesus' choice not to fight for his freedom? How can Christians claim that the suffering love of God on the cross is central to their faith and then gleefully support a public execution? Crucifixion was the Roman equivalent of a firing squad. Just a reminder: Afghanistan and Iran and probably North Korea are the only nations to enact the death penalty in public.
It is with shock and great sorrow that I have learned of the Department of War’s decision to publicly livestream the execution of Nidal Hasan. Our God is the God of life. In no way can Hassan’s actions be condoned but this decision is a barbaric promotion of a culture of death and must be reconsidered. The word of God exhorts us: ‘do not repay anyone evil for evil' (Romans 12:17). The public execution even of one who has done grave harm will only further undermine the moral fabric of our nation and be a blight on the conscience of its people.
Archbishop Paul S. Coakley, president of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops
Amen.












