The Lord is my shepherd; I shall not want.
He maketh me to lie down in green pastures: he leadeth me beside the still waters.
He restoreth my soul: he leadeth me in the paths of righteousness for his name's sake.
Yea, though I walk through the valley of the shadow of death, I will fear no evil: for thou art with me; thy rod and thy staff they comfort me.
Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies: thou anointest my head with oil; my cup runneth over.
Surely goodness and mercy shall follow me all the days of my life: and I will dwell in the house of the Lord for ever.
Psalm 23 King James Version
Any Jeopardy fans out there? If so, you may have noticed through the years that The Bible, meaning for their team the scriptures of Older and New Testaments, is a category from time to time and the translation used is still the 400-year-old King James Version. It is curious because only a small percentage of congregations, and I would assume individuals, use the KJV on a regular basis.
This once vaunted and still venerable version of the bible came into being as something of a compromise. King James IV of Scotland, also King James I of Britain (ya confusing), brought together disparate religious stakeholders in a time of often bloody turmoil. In a guest essay in the New York Times yesterday with the intriguing title Why My Gen Z Students Are Fascinated by the King James Bible Vassar associate English professor Pasquale Toscano explains:
As with all great things, the King James Bible began at a conference. (At least this one was at a palace.) The 1604 meeting came soon after James VI of Scotland assumed England’s throne. Born to a Catholic mother but raised by hard-line Protestants, James hoped to be something of a religious unifier. He met with representatives of two feuding factions within the Church of England: high churchmen and Puritans. Most of the Puritans’ ideas for religious reform were shot down — except for one. James agreed to authorize a new translation of the Bible.
Toscano goes on to describe the remarkable format for creating an English language bible.Six companies, or committees, each made up of preachers and scholars were assigned to translate from Greek and Hebrew, and I would imagine Latin. They would wrestle with the texts, sparring in their cadres but also sharing with the other committees. Somehow this unwieldy sounding process created one of the great accomplishments in the English language.
Toscano goes on the say:
One of these men, John Overall, was so fluent in Latin that speaking English left him sapped. Another, the virulently learned Lancelot Andrewes, gave sermons in English that drew huge crowds. Descriptions like this one in Genesis, “The earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep,” sparkle with his signature sheen of parallelism and theatrical cadence.
Other translators achieved eloquent majesty of their own. One of my favorite passages is the paean to human perseverance in Psalm 30: “For his anger endureth but a moment; in his favour is life: Weeping may endure for a night, but joy cometh in the morning.”
Toscano's students often know very little about the bible, with even the names of Adam and Eve barely registering recognition. Yet despite the illiteracy this generation raised on texts and TikTok marvel at the poetic language and cadence of what emerged as the "authorized version, as well as the inspired intellectual process that created it -- divinely inspired?
I've noted before that in 2011, the 400th anniversary of the publication of the KJV, I read a couple of excellent books about how this bible came into being. I proposed to the clergy members of the ministerial to which I belonged, that we have a joint service where we would read some of the iconic passages from this version. I never used the King James Bible in worship, instead during my ministry, depending instead on the more accurate and inclusive Revised Standard Version. which begat the New RSV, followed by the NRSV Updated Edition. But in the early years lots of evangelicals insisted that this was the only true translation and rejected pretenders to the throne. The response to my suggestion about a celebration of the King James Bible was polite indifference. Even though most of my colleagues were evangelicals they figured no one would show up.
Should we all be polishing off our "yea's" and "maketh's?" Verily, I can't imagine that there will be a groundswell of KJV usage in the days ahead yet it's encouraging to hear that some young 'uns appreciate what it has to offer. Of course, in Texas, essentially another culture wars planet, there is proposed legislation to return KJV reading to the classroom, whatever that's about. But that's another blog altogether.