Did anyone else read the article featured on the front page of the Globe and Mail Saturday, and expanded within the Focus section? The title was Loneliness: The Trouble With Solitude and written by Elizabeth Renzetti. I thought it was well developed and explored the challenges of loneliness as we age, the contradictions of a "connected" culture which can actually isolate us, and the stigma of loneliness. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/life-of-solitude-a-loneliness-crisis-is-looming/article15573187/?page=all
I thought Renzetti got it wrong in making loneliness and solitude synonymous. During our Silence, Solitude, Sanctuary, and Simplicity study group this Fall we talked about the difference between choosing aloneness as a way of spiritual recollection and loneliness, enforced or otherwise. Solitude need not be the debilitating, isolating experience described in the article. http://www.psychologytoday.com/collections/201105/solitude-vs-loneliness/what-is-solitude
When Renzetti gave the example of the Vancouver Foundation giving out grants to organizations creating community events I wondered why she didn't point out that study after study indicates that those who gather regularly for worship are healthier in body, mind, and spirit. While organized religion is becoming the unexplored option for many Canadians, we are apparently getting lonelier. Might there be a connection? Religion also encourages us not to be so self-absorbed, with many opportunities to lose our lives in concern for others in order to find a sense of meaning.
Do you see the distinction between solitude and loneliness? Has Christian community made a difference for you when it comes to a sense of belonging? Why is it "against the religion" of so many writers these days to offer religion as an option?

